|

楼主 |
发表于 2009-6-12 15:31
|
显示全部楼层
EU 第7框架评分方法。
感觉比国内的自然基金好多了。
SCORING
Scores must be in the range 0-5. Decimal points may be given.
Interpretation of the scores:
0- The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete information.
1– Poor. The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses.
2– Fair. While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses.
3– Good. The proposal addresses the criterion well, although improvements would be necessary.
4– Very good. The proposal addresses the criterion very well, although certain improvements are still possible.
5--Excellent. The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor. |
|