|
本帖最后由 吃花生的大灰狼 于 2009-9-16 23:40 编辑
8 L0 I, I4 {) X4 o6 E. P, ?# O! m- n, ], s
Just my two cents. Not necessarily correct since I have not a native speaker. ) T" ?7 v/ i( J. @0 c& \% _1 F5 H: l
2 D( g& R4 h' }9 R1. Once one of them does not functionate, the other counterpart could still be resorted.
0 { M0 J# w# R) i6 B5 F7 t% s9 KOne ... the other... Counterpart is not necessary.7 R/ p( n5 W2 ^
resort to sth0 j1 y; t* M7 \7 M: |% B
2. stipulate what the people’s rights and obligations are.
% x, Q4 x" ?9 I "stipulate sth" is enough./ k% ]/ M4 O1 R, Z3 ]3 E( i J9 ]
3. the above mentioned legal system." s7 n* g% ]! @' W$ _
I think "above mentioned" is redundant. By the way, sth mentioned above or the aforementioned ... sound better.$ K6 h" }" w/ \" v) u
4. The same incompliance might receive even contrary judgment, consequently it is impossible to maintain the justice and people would never advocate such unfair governance., G8 C, g* M& k: [6 U5 [4 U
4 `' [* n/ c' ?$ L% q
I would break it into two sentences.7 ~: a4 m; V4 v# U% ~8 P, ^- m
Even the same ... Consequently,...
6 H0 c% n8 w/ q3 s2 F; T$ D5 n- k) K5 H4 W' ~, _6 A) ^
5. Therefore in other words,
* |1 [7 P; A* u; a& y+ T1 P) y1 L9 V. ]6 r
One of them is enough. z$ }: K0 N' r7 _
3 X7 |% C5 z5 }2 j9 n, u- T3 d6. are highly likely shown to be unbecoming for the newly emerging situation, |
|